UGANDA’S FOOD SAFETY NET: ARE WE READY FOR THE UNEXPECTED?

Food Rights Alliance|Press Release|UGANDA’S FOOD SAFETY NET: ARE WE READY FOR THE UNEXPECTED?

Uganda’s food safety landscape is plagued by alarming statistics, with 1.3 million cases of foodborne illnesses reported annually, resulting in significant economic losses and health risks. As the world marks World Food Safety Day, Uganda must confront its food safety challenges and prepare for the unexpected.

Until recent years, food safety and quality have not been prioritized in policy agendas in Uganda and Africa at large, in favor of strategies for increased production and productivity to combat food insecurity. As a result, while food has become largely available and accessible on markets, it remains unsafe for consumption. Food safety risks in Uganda have not only posed significant threats to the health of the population, but also the competitiveness of agricultural commodities, which are the foundations of inclusive growth and sustainable development in the country.

Today, Uganda registers 1.3 million cases of foodborne illnesses annually, which account for 14% of all cases treated (MoH). In addition, the country suffers a loss of USD 77 million on treatment of 3700 cases of aflatoxin-induced cancer cases (FAO). This is because up to 65% of Ugandan maize contains aflatoxin levels above the Ugandan maximum limit of 10 ppb for total aflatoxins (PACA), which has led to its repeated rejection on regional markets like Kenya and South Sudan. As a result, aflatoxins cause USD 7.48 Million decline in export value, which accounts for a 45% reduction in total agricultural exports and a 0.26% reduction in economic growth. Uganda’s fruits and vegetables also register high contamination rates from the use of contaminated water and direct application of chemicals after harvest. Currently, over 82% of vegetables and fruits in markets contain carbamates (Rikolto, 2021).

See the details of this paper from the link: https://fra.ug/vefeput/2024/06/World-Food-Safety-Day-statement-2024.pdf

Additionally, the country loses USD 577 million annually as a result of about 3700 aflatoxin-induced liver cancer cases. (https://www.fao.org/uganda/news/detail-events/fr/c/1628194/). These are just a pinch of Aflatoxin impacts on both the health and the economy of Uganda. Partially it’s because we as Ugandans have not done enough together with responsible stakeholders. Although much emphasis has been put on the science of Aflatoxins which has made it difficult to understand, there’s a need to understand there are several contributing factors for the rising cases of aflatoxins in Uganda i.e;

The moral decay of society contributes to increased cases of Aflatoxins: Adherence to existing standards is still an enormous challenge. Some actors, knowing the Aflatoxin concern, still chose to for example harvest maize before drying properly and do not take time to dry it while at the stores. Actually, middlemen have resorted to buying maize directly from the garden before fully drying. Farmers are given quick cash as long as they accept a reduction in the amount they are paid per kilogram to save them from the burden of drying. Unfortunately, middlemen do not equally take time to dry the maize and other grains properly so as not to reduce weight but well knowing that storing improper dried products may provide a favourable environment for mycotoxins. The responsible ministries and enforcement agencies need to rise up to the occasion otherwise a lot is still being done.

Aflatoxins and poverty Inseparable: Looking at Schools, parents that do not have money deliver maize flour and groundnut paste to schools in exchange for payment of school dues. Many of these parents harvest undried products, and while at school, some schools do not invest enough in storage facilities so you find a number of them leaking, etc. which creates room for the growth and emergence of mycotoxins. Looking at consumption, it’s commonly the poor that prefer cheaper groundnut paste, maize and other flours, people would prefer paying less. The majority of the cheaply sold groundnut paste and flours are stored in markets for months and then sold cheaply. Sadly, each day, the seller simply tops up on the left paste to fill in the newly processed one. We need to stand up to the occasion and ensure the enforcement of existing regulations. 

Population growth rate an immediate relative to the rising aflatoxin cases: The current Ugandan population is a 48million people which grew by almost 3% from last year’s population as per the World Bank, This has resulted in increased demand for locally produced foods especially grains and their products and definitely. Unfortunately, many farmers do not have the patience to wait for the proper drying of their grains backed up by poor storage. This increased demand has also resulted in mushrooming unlicensed, unmonitored and uncontrolled processing facilities which are unfortunately breeding places for aflatoxins. A visit to many processing facilities in Kisenyi a Kampala suburb would shock you.

Much as we have each one contributed to the rising aflatoxins and related cases, we can do a number of things that range from localized awareness of aflatoxins and their effects, fight Corruption, embezzlement of funds intended to support farmer, put in place adequate enforcement of standards by required bodies, revision of Non Trade Barriers for example trucks of maize and other grains spend weeks at border points amidst poor storage and rainy weather, this needs urgent revision, government needs to set up and enforce a Quality Management Systems, involving farmers, handlers and traders strongly recommended for effective control of Aflatoxins, encourage Good Agricultural Practices, Good Storage Practices, Good Hygienic Practices, Good manufacturing Practices, set up a consumer protection law in Uganda because eexisting regulations have left the consumers helpless, especially at a time when there is increasing cases of aflatoxin related liver cancer cases, Capacity building of the actors to address the institutional regulatory gaps.

Food Rights Alliance

Explore More